Feed aggregator

The gap between AI insiders and everyone else is widening, and the spending, suspicion, and even new vocabulary are starting to show it. While OpenAI is busy buying up everything from finance apps to talk shows, a certain shoe company just rebranded as an AI infrastructure play, and Anthropic unveiled a model it says is too powerful to release publicly …but apparently not too […]

Users are fed up with misinformation and AI slop cluttering their feeds. SaySo is a new short-form video app that delivers news from vetted creators and journalists.

The San Francisco startup closed a Series C funding round led by Antonio Gracias' firm Valor, which is a major backer of xAI.

More than a year into President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, undocumented students at Cabrillo College are increasingly avoiding campus services and financial aid programs due to fear of exposing personal information. College staff report declining participation and heightened anxiety among students, even as the school expands resources to reassure and support them.

The post Out of fear, fewer undocumented Cabrillo students seeking services more than a year into Trump immigration crackdown appeared first on Lookout Santa Cruz.

Starts new one on boot loops

More than a year after giving administrators an unwelcome surprise with a security update that turned out to be a Windows Server 2025 upgrade, Microsoft has marked the incident as "resolved."…

Hector Marin has become a recognizable name throughout Santa Cruz over the past four years. He’s twice run for Santa Cruz City Council, first against Greg Hyver and current District 4 City Councilmember Scott Newsome in 2022, and again in 2024, when he challenged District 2 City Councilmember Sonja Brunner.

Although he lost both races, Marin is embarking on his third campaign, once again facing off against Newsome, who is running for his second term. 

ELECTION 2026: Read more local, state and national coverage here from Lookout and our content partners

Marin told Lookout he loves the city and wants to serve the public. What keeps him running for District 4 – covering downtown and part of the Westside bounded by High Street to the north and Bay Street to the west – is simple, he said: the cost of living.

“As a renter, it’s very unstable in terms of housing and making sure we have a permanent place to call home,” he said. Marin teaches English language development and special education at Harbor High School, and said that his students and their families face the affordability problem constantly. “This story is reflective of many stories that our children and local working families are going through.”

Marin said he’s focused on being a “unifying voice” in the community, and that he strives to bring the general public together to find solutions to the city’s most pressing issues, such as affordable housing. He is also aiming to host more events for the public, such as community cleanup days.

Santa Cruz City Council candidate Hector Marin (right) answers a question posed by Lookout moderator Jody K. Biehl during a 2024 forum. Credit: Kevin Painchaud / Lookout Santa Cruz

On affordable housing, Marin said he will advocate to ease the requirements for fully affordable housing projects, reduce red tape and push for rent stabilization that works for both the renter and the property owner.

More broadly, Marin said he wants to establish “cultural overlay zoning districts” so that local establishments or businesses that are popular or historical can be preserved.

Marin said he’s learned that the city will need both market-rate and affordable housing to make the city more affordable, but also that he wants to make sure there are more tangible paths toward ownership for Santa Cruzans. That could include rent-to-own units, like condos, for people to work toward owning their own property in a community with extremely high home prices.

“I’m also the only candidate calling for mixed-income housing,” he said. The Downtown Plan Expansion, he said, encourages housing separation, with lower-income residents and higher-income residents housed in different buildings. “No matter what your socioeconomic status is, you can still be in our community and you are still welcome.”

Marin said he also wants to prioritize creating a “clean, safe and inclusive Santa Cruz.” To do that, he said he’d like to start a program he calls the Santa Cruz Volunteer Corps. The program would bring together community members and partner with nonprofits to continuously clean up and beautify the city. He also wants to introduce educational workshops for youth cyclists and e-bike riders, along with stricter regulations of the powerful electric bikes. 

With nonprofit Housing Matters’ day services now officially closed, Marin said getting replacement services set up for the unhoused community is a major issue. While some temporary replacement facilities have been established, long-term fixes remain uncertain. He advocates building permanent 24-hour bathroom facilities throughout downtown, with city workers and community safety officers regularly monitoring the areas.

“If there’s a lack of day-center services for unhoused community members, we will see the impacts downtown, and our downtown residents will feel unsafe,” he said. “The city has to step in proactively, provide money and collaborate with the county Office of [Response, Recovery and] Resiliency.”

Marin said he supports the current city council’s January move to exit its contract with Flock Safety and halt use of its automated license plate readers. He said his commitment to helping and protecting local immigrant residents is a major factor in keeping him involved politically. He said District 4 has a large Latino population, particularly in the Beach Flats area, and that the district’s representative needs to take that seriously. He said he wants to make sure the city council and the city manager communicate frequently to stay on top of local federal immigration enforcement, and that federal immigration officers are “prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law” if they try to wrongfully arrest a community member.

Should he be elected, Marin said he will immediately set up meetings with his constituents and host town halls for residents to bring their concerns and issues directly to him. 

He said this will be a continuation of his work in the community, including his teaching job and the various events he has helped host, such as a community toy drive in Beach Flats, a Mexican Independence Day celebration and more.

“We want local government to be a place that goes to you and takes initiative, and we want to get people excited and energized about local government,” Marin said. “That’s what this is about, and that’s what we’ll bring in our city council tenure.”

Have something to say? Lookout welcomes letters to the editor, within our policies, from readers. Guidelines here.

The post In third city council run, Hector Marin says he’s staying true to his goals: Community advocacy, inclusivity and transparency appeared first on Lookout Santa Cruz.

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for its newsletters.

Democrats are searching for a hero to save them in the California governor’s race.

So far, no one in party leadership has come to the rescue.

ELECTION 2026: Read more local, state and national coverage here from Lookout and our content partners

Despite Rep. Eric Swalwell’s exit from the race this week, the Democratic field remains unwieldy, with seven major candidates still splitting the field less than three weeks before ballots are sent. Each of them refuses to bow out, regardless of their polling numbers, in the hope they can capture some of the voter attention that Swalwell’s demise drew to the race.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the face of the party in California, is not interested in elevating a successor. Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks, who faces criticism for not using his position to cull the field, has relied on party-commissioned polls and vague pleas for candidates to “honestly assess” their campaign’s viability, refusing to openly pressure anyone to drop out. 

Even former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — known for urging then-Rep. Adam Schiff to run for Senate and former President Joe Biden to drop his reelection bid — won’t intervene.

“People have reached out to me saying, ‘Your mom has to do something!’” said Christine Pelosi, daughter of the San Francisco congresswoman and herself a candidate for state Senate. 

“I said, ‘You know what? She doesn’t, though,’” the younger Pelosi said. “She already did that with Biden and [former Vice President Kamala] Harris. She’s not going to — don’t look to her to do that again.”

Gone is the heyday of the San Francisco-based political machine, a network of political talent that dominated state politics for decades and produced titans such as Pelosi and Newsom, both of whom are moving on from California politics. 

Now that pipeline has run dry, and this year there is no obvious heir to Newsom for the party to coalesce behind. No current statewide officeholder joined the fray, and both presumptive favorites — Harris and U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla — opted not to run. 

That has made top Democrats loath to weigh in on the state’s first truly open Democratic primary in 16 years. In 2018, Newsom, then the lieutenant governor, was widely viewed as the most likely successor to former Gov. Jerry Brown, another product of the San Francisco political machine.

The 2026 race is also only the second time an open field has competed under the top-two primary system, adopted 16 years ago to the chagrin of both parties. That means two Democrats or two Republicans could advance to the general election and lock the other party out. 

Newsom reiterated his lack of interest this week when he issued a statement that said in part, “I have full confidence that voters will choose a candidate who reflects the values and direction Californians believe in.” 

Too much democracy for Democrats?

While grassroots activists have for decades decried the king-making of insider machine politics, the alternative — an abundance of candidates with no clear frontrunner — has proved unappealing too. 

The resulting decision paralysis has resurrected calls for a strong leader to step in.

“This has been incredibly frustrating, not to mention scary, with the idea that we could end up with two Republicans,” said RL Miller, a longtime delegate and chair of the party’s environmental caucus. “I really do believe that there has been a failure of leadership at the top.”

Miller theorized that party leaders were overcorrecting after years of backlash following the 2016 presidential election, in which establishment Democrats disregarded the grassroots support for Sen. Bernie Sanders and instead anointed Hillary Clinton. 

As more Democratic gubernatorial candidates entered the fray in the past year, Miller said she thought leadership had the “admirable intent” of letting delegates winnow the field themselves. 

But anxieties were already spiking before the Democrats’ endorsing convention in February, where none of the nine candidates vying for the gubernatorial nod amassed more than 25% — far short of the 60% needed. Hicks faced repeated questions then about whether he would step in, but insisted it wasn’t his role.

“By the party convention, the alarm bells had been ringing for months,” said Miller, who has consistently voted against Hicks in internal party elections.

California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks addresses the media in Sacramento in 2023. Credit: Miguel Gutierrez Jr. / CalMatters

After the convention, Hicks released an open letter urging that “every candidate honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign,” and “if you do not have a viable path to make it to the general election” not to file to run. Only one listened, former Assemblymember Ian Calderon, who was polling around 1% or less. 

Later, Hicks announced the party would conduct ongoing polls on the race and release them every seven to 10 days through early May, when ballots are sent. 

Hicks’ defenders said he was right to abstain from picking favorites. Christine Pelosi said it would be “inappropriate” for the chair to weigh in on the candidates after delegates at the party convention chose not to endorse anyone. 

Hicks’ calls for candidates to “consider their viability” was a “somewhat extraordinary and surprising” move, said Paul Mitchell, the architect of the gerrymandered congressional maps that voters approved via Proposition 50 to boost congressional Democrats in the upcoming election. 

“It maybe wasn’t surprising for people who think that the Democratic Party chair is like a backroom dealer that’s going to knock heads or something like that,” Mitchell said. “But that’s not the chair’s role in California right now.”

Top-two primary adds to tension

Both Mitchell and Christine Pelosi blamed the top-two system for much of the drama. The slim possibility that two Republicans could emerge from the primary has spurred many of the calls for leadership to weigh in. 

Mitchell argued that since President Donald Trump put a thumb on the scale by endorsing former Fox News host Steve Hilton, there’s less risk that both Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco would end up on the November ticket, alleviating some of the pressure on Democrats. 

“If it wasn’t a top two, people wouldn’t care,” said Christine Pelosi. “You wouldn’t have the added agita of ‘there’s only two Republicans and there’s a bunch of Democrats.’”

Notably, the state GOP failed to endorse a candidate at its recent convention, indicating that Trump’s nod might not hold as much sway as Democrats assume.

Still, if Hicks is trying to convince rank-and-file Democrats he’s doing enough, it’s not working. 

Amar Shergill, the former leader of the party’s progressive caucus, suggested that its weak, decentralized leadership was by design so monied interests could exert more control over who gets elected.

“Rusty Hicks is furniture that folks with real power use at their discretion,” Shergill said. 

“There’s no sort of anger or animosity towards him as a person,” he said. “If it wasn’t Rusty, it would be somebody else. This is just the political situation right now.”

In an interview, Hicks told CalMatters that he is “doing what is required” to ensure a Democrat wins the race. But when pressed repeatedly, Hicks would not elaborate on what that work entails, if he believes what he’s done so far is working or if he should have had a stronger hand in culling the field, as his critics have suggested.

“I’m not interested in opening up the playbook as to what we will or will not do in the coming days and weeks,” he said.

CalMatters’ Yue Stella Yu contributed to this report.

Have something to say? Lookout welcomes letters to the editor, within our policies, from readers. Guidelines here.

The post California Democrats can’t decide on a governor. Don’t count on Newsom or Pelosi for help appeared first on Lookout Santa Cruz.

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for its newsletters.

Earlier this year, tickets to see SZA perform at the Crypto Arena in Los Angeles were selling for $600 the day before they officially went on sale at $35 a piece. In San Francisco, tickets to see Sam Smith at the newly renovated Castro Theater went on sale for $120, only to be quickly snatched up by scalpers and resold for upward of $600. 

Those are some of the stories that California lawmakers are citing as they advance two plans to change the ticketing landscape. One caps the extent to which resellers can mark up the original ticket price while the other prohibits resellers from selling tickets they don’t yet own. 

Democratic Assemblymembers Issac Bryan of Culver City and Matt Haney of San Francisco are each carrying bills that they say would protect consumers from fraudulent and deceptive ticket sales. 

Both measures are backed by the ticket market’s dominant seller, Live Nation, which owns Ticketmaster. Its support has some worried that the bills will help the company crush its competitors and jack up prices. A federal jury in New York this week found that the company illegally acted as a monopoly in a victory for, among others, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who with colleagues in other states sued the company two years ago and kept going after federal prosecutors settled. Live Nation is now awaiting penalties.

Despite these headwinds, the ticket bills are sailing through the Legislature.

Supporters say the legislation has nothing to do with the antitrust case against Live Nation and helps consumers. Opponents disagree.

“The state Legislature should really be standing up for consumers instead of advancing bills that are there to help a monopoly that has been caught on record calling its fans stupid and has bragged about robbing them blind,” said Jose Barrera, national vice president for the far west region at the League of United Latin American Citizens, a civil rights advocacy group. 

Ticketmaster’s competitors in the online resale market are lobbying against the measures, a sign that they view the proposals as a threat to their business. 

Jack Sterne, StubHub’s head of policy communications, wrote to CalMatters, stating, “Passing laws that hand the Ticketmaster monopoly more power and don’t actually make tickets more affordable is the last thing California’s leaders should do.”

But Stephen Parker, executive director of the National Independent Venue Association, which is co-sponsoring the bills, argues that they will regulate the marketplace to better protect fans by limiting price gouging and encouraging the face value — or below face value — exchange of tickets. 

“Ultimately, that is what these bills will do, in addition to making sure that the tickets are actually real,” he said. “That is a good thing for California consumers. It’s a good thing for artists and it’s a good thing for these small businesses and nonprofits that make up the independent stages across the state.”

A Live Nation spokesperson said in a statement to CalMatters, “The resale lobby constantly tries to change the subject by pointing fingers at Ticketmaster, even though it has less than 25% of the resale market. This has nothing to do with anyone’s monopoly, but rather is about protecting fans from scalpers and the resale sites that cater to them.”

The company has spent roughly $165,000 on lobbying efforts this legislative session, including to support Bryan’s bill. 

‘Unlikely allies’

Bryan’s Assembly Bill 1349 would ban the sale of speculative tickets — or tickets that are not in the possession or ownership of the people who list them online. In an April hearing, Bryan said the bill protects consumers from predatory mark ups.

“This bill is so important that, after our introduction, it brought unlikely allies together,” Bryan said, according to the CalMatters Digital Democracy database. “In fact, this bill brought the Giants and the Dodgers together, brought the National Independent Venue Association and Live Nation together. ​​It brought Kendrick Lamar and Kid Rock together. It brought Isaac Bryan and Donald Trump together.”

Several secondary ticket sellers are fighting the measure, including StubHub, SeatGeek and Vivid Seats. The three companies have spent roughly $1.1 million dollars on lobbying efforts this legislative session, which included opposition to Bryan’s bill. 

People watch fireworks during Bad Bunny’s halftime show from a parking garage outside Super Bowl LX at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara on Feb. 8, 2026. Credit: Jungho Kim for CalMatters

Opponents including Robert Herrell, executive director for the Consumer Federation of California, argue that the bill strengthens Live Nation Ticketmaster’s grip on the ticketing and live entertainment industry. According to them, the measure would give Live Nation complete control over the ticket even after it has been purchased — meaning, for example, that consumers could lose the ability to sell it or give it away.

“There’s no consumer choice in the matter,” said Herrell. “They can keep people out of shows if they want to. There have been situations where, if you bought a ticket on the secondary market, you’ve been denied entry into a show.” 

Proponents say Herrell and other opponents are mistaken. They say they are not trying to prevent transferability but rather, they want to protect fans from speculative costs.

“We want those rooms full,” said Ron Gubitz, executive director of Music Artists Coalition, which is co-sponsoring both bills. “So you have to be able to transfer a ticket. We just want it to be in a way that’s safe, trustworthy and not creating this run on the market that exists now.”

Gubitz pointed to a recent Bruno Mars concert, where tickets were on StubHub for $400 to $2,000 before they were on sale through Ticketmaster.

“That’s crazy,” he said. “That’s a speculative ticket that Bryan’s bill is trying to stop. That shouldn’t happen. It’s not fair to anybody, except for the secondary [market]. It seems great for them.”

Price caps in a free market

Haney’s Assembly Bill 1720, also known as the California Fans First Act, would put a 10% cap on resale event ticket markups, inclusive of the ticket fees. In other words, a reseller could not charge more than 10% higher than the original ticket price.

In an interview with CalMatters, Haney said artists, independent venues and downtowns are currently being “screwed over and exploited” by scalpers and brokers.

“We can’t allow the status quo to continue if we want to ensure Californians have access to affordable tickets to see their favorite artists or if we want independent venues or the broader landscape of musicians and artists to thrive in our state,” he said.

Haney rejected the idea that his bill would strengthen the Live Nation Ticketmaster monopoly, saying that the company is one of the biggest operators and profiteers of the secondary ticket market and would therefore be subject to the same restrictions as any other platform or broker. 

“I don’t think it’s a free market to allow folks to come in and buy up all these tickets and then create scarcity and then you’re now required to buy your ticket at a much higher price from someone who had nothing to do with the event,” he said. “This is not something we would ever allow for airplane tickets or even dinner reservations.”

The bill has been criticized by opponents like Diana Moss, vice president and director of competition policy at Progressive Policy Institute, who said price caps notoriously distort the market, describing them as “anti-consumer, anti-competitive and anti-artist.”

“If you shut down the resale market with price caps then guess what? Ticket buyers have no place to go but right back to Ticketmaster,” said Moss. “If [Live Nation] succeed[s] in decimating the resale market, then they steer millions and millions of fans back to their own ticketing platform where they charge monopoly ticket fees and where fans are hostage to their glitchy online platform and all of their data, privacy and security concerns that we always hear about in the news.”

Those concerns didn’t stop the bill from passing out of the Assembly Committee on Arts, Entertainment, Sports and Tourism last week with a 6-1 vote. The bill also passed out of the Assembly Committee on Privacy & Consumer Protection on Thursday with a 9-4 vote.

Cayla Mihalovich is a California Local News fellow.

Have something to say? Lookout welcomes letters to the editor, within our policies, from readers. Guidelines here.

The post Live Nation is supporting two California bills to lower ticket prices. Can fans trust it? appeared first on Lookout Santa Cruz.

Rosalind Franklin moving again, though another budget cut looms

NASA is moving ahead with its contribution to the European Space Agency's (ESA) long-delayed Rosalind Franklin Mars rover despite another attempt by the Trump administration to cut funding for the effort.…

Users who stream their own media files ticked off as Plex warns Alexa skill will die on June 15

Plex is pulling the plug on its Alexa integration, leaving anyone who relied on voice commands to wrangle their media library out of luck.…

University student says he plans to move to Android, but concedes iOS engineers acting fast

Apple is finally working on a fix for a bug that has locked some users out of their iPhones for months, The Register understands.…

Jack might be on Track, but the order screen certainly isn't

Bork!Bork!Bork!  It was not so much Jack in the Box as Bork on the Screen at a US drive-through fast food outlet the other day. Luckily, a Reg reader was there to take it all in.…

Top civil servant tells MPs bid was strong on quality and value for money

The UK government awarded Capita a £239 million contract to run the Civil Service Pension Scheme (CSPS) after assessing its past performance, despite the rollout later leaving thousands of retirees waiting for payments, a senior civil servant has said.…

All that kit, and the fix was simply stepping aside

On Call  Life is filled with random events, but The Register tries to make readers’ lives just a little more predictable by always using Friday morning to bring you a new instalment of On Call – the reader-contributed column that shares your tech support stories.…

Pause your Mythos panic because mainstream models anyone can use already pick holes in popular software

Anthropic withheld its Mythos bug-finding model from public release due to concerns that it would enable attackers to find and exploit vulnerabilities before anyone could react.…

Fast WAN consortium thinks neoclouds are ripe for hookups

The IOWN Global Forum will likely focus on datacenter interconnect use cases in the, to help diverse providers of AI infrastructure ply their trade.…

Fix for critical flaw is an OS update you may not be able to make because the junk data uses all memory

More than 230 different models of Cisco Wi-Fi access points may be writing 5MB a day of nonessential data, filling their onboard flash memory to the point at which they lack space for future software updates.…

Although we’re a little sad that Stuart, Kevin, and Bob won’t be joining, we can’t wait to see what fresh mischief awaits us in Minions & Monsters this summer. The official trailer gave us our first taste back in February, following the Minions as they summon Cthulhu. Illumination dropped another sneak peak at CinemaCon 2026. The two hilariously chaotic new clips see the Minions rise to Hollywood stardom. The first scene places them on set in a gunslinging Western sequence, while the second is full of viking/gladiatorial action.

Illumination

In Minions & Monsters, the Minions really embody what it means to be a struggling actor in Hollywood. The first clip depicts an old Western sequence. It’s very loud and chaotic. We see an outlaw on a horse running away as others chase him. The Minions pile on the back of a wagon to attack those chasing the man. The man is shocked to see the yellow creatures and runs away, but the Minions chase him on top of a moving train. The outlaw waves to someone in a prop plane to rescue him, but the Minions don’t let up. They derail the entire plane, which barrels toward a woman and her baby. The yellow creatures use their collective weight the push the train away just in time.

The Minions eventually corner the man in an alleyway, putting an end to this wild chase. Suddenly, the director yells “CUT!!” He scolds the Minions for ruining everything and kicks them out. That’s showbusiness.

RELATED ARTICLE

MINIONS & MONSTERS Announces Oscar-Studded Cast

After realizing his boss wants the Minions there, the director finds the yellow creatures and brings them back to the studio. The second clip returns us to set, this time for a viking/gladiator face-off. The Minions, dressed as Roman gladiators, must fight a group of heavily armed men who want them dead. The director tells them to sell the drama; If they fail, they will have to go back to scavenging food. When the vikings charge, Minion chaos ensues. They use tools to fight back against the burly men, including poking one in the eye. To everyone’s surprise, the director says it was perfect. The Minions cheer as the human cast lies in pain.

Illumination

The Minions become big movie stars, which is complicated because they can’t actually speak their lines. Unfortunately, Minion speak isn’t very common in Hollywood. So, two Minions named Henry and James decide to make their own movie. They seek out monsters to be their stars, inciting even more chaos. We just can’t wait to see how it all turns out when the movie hits theaters this summer.

Minions & Monsters arrives on July 1, 2026.

The post MINIONS & MONSTERS New Footage See the Minions Become Big Movie Stars appeared first on Nerdist.

Sense and Sensibility brought much yearning to CinemaCon 2026. Coming later this year, Focus Features is adapting Jane Austen’s classic and beloved novel. Nerdist caught the exclusive trailer, which shows the beloved Dashwood family as they vacate their home. Daisy Edgar-Jones is set to play the beloved heroine Elinor Dashwood. Love and yearning is at an all-time high when Elinor becomes taken with the very handsome Edward.

Columbia Pictures

Focus Features’ exclusive look of the upcoming adaption is short and sweet. We see the Dashwood family as they are forced out of their lovely estate. Soon after, Mrs. Jennings (Fiona Shaw) arrives and sets out to have the Dashwood girls married. Edward appears next, struck by Elinor’s beauty and grace, while Marianne falls in love with the handsome John Willoughby. Much yearning follows, including a shot of Mr. WIlloughby carrying Marianna home after hurting her ankle.

Sense and Sensibility is a classically beloved tale about love and heartbreak. When news broke that Focus Features is adapting its own version of the story, hopeless romantics everywhere rejoiced. Daisy Edgar-Jones and Esmé Creed-Miles will play the lovely Dashwood sisters, Elinor and Marianne. Elinor is rational and composed, while Marianna is much more emotional and romantic. George MacKay and Frank Dillane will play the girls’ handsome suitors, while Caitriona Balfe is Mrs. Dashwood.

RELATED ARTICLE

This Jane Austen Board Game Is Perfect for Romantics

Daisy Edgar-Jones has proven her romantic acting chops in the past, starring alongside Paul Mescal Normal People (which is arguably more of a horror story than a romance, but I digress). Emma Thompson first portrayed Elinor in the 1995 film, lending Daisy some pretty big shoes to fill. But, with a reportiore like Daisy’s, we have no doubt that she’ll be able to step up.

Columbia Pictures/Mirage

Sense and Sensibility calls viewers to open their hearts and tune into their sense. We can’t wait to see how Focus Features will bring this classic tale of yearning to life. The film hits theaters on October 16.

The post Daisy Edgar-Jones Exudes Yearning in SENSE AND SENSIBILITY Trailer appeared first on Nerdist.

The fundraise is the first major capital raise under Sequoia's new leadership, with Alfred Lin and Pat Grady now serving as co-stewards of the 54-year-old firm.